Tham khảo Nghiện_hành_vi

  1. Albrecht U, Kirschner NE, Grüsser SM (2007). “Diagnostic instruments for behavioural addiction: an overview”. Psychosom Med 4: Doc11. PMC 2736529. PMID 19742294
  2. Potenza MN (tháng 9 năm 2006). “Should addictive disorders include non-substance-related conditions?”. Addiction. 101 Suppl 1: 142–51. PMID 16930171. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01591.x
  3. Shaffer, Howard J. (1996). “Understanding the means and objects of addiction: Technology, the internet, and gambling”. Journal of Gambling Studies 12 (4): 461–9. PMID 24234163. doi:10.1007/BF01539189
  4. 1 2 Robison AJ, Nestler EJ (tháng 11 năm 2011). “Transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms of addiction”. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12 (11): 623–637. PMC 3272277. PMID 21989194. doi:10.1038/nrn3111. ΔFosB has been linked directly to several subtstance-related behaviors ... Importantly, genetic or viral overexpression of ΔJunD, a dominant negative mutant of JunD which antagonizes ΔFosB- and other AP-1-mediated transcriptional activity, in the NAc or OFC blocks these key effects of drug exposure14,22–24. This indicates that ΔFosB is both necessary and sufficient for many of the changes wrought in the brain by chronic drug exposure. ΔFosB is also induced in D1-type NAc MSNs by chronic consumption of several natural rewards, including sucrose, high fat food, sex, wheel running, where it promotes that consumption14,26–30. This implicates ΔFosB in the regulation of natural rewards under normal conditions and perhaps during pathological addictive-like states. 
  5. 1 2 Olsen CM (tháng 12 năm 2011). “Natural rewards, neuroplasticity, and non-drug addictions”. Neuropharmacology 61 (7): 1109–22. PMC 3139704. PMID 21459101. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.03.010
  6. Stein, Dan J.; Hollander, Eric; Rothbaum, Barbara Olasov (ngày 31 tháng 8 năm 2009). Textbook of Anxiety Disorders. American Psychiatric Pub. tr. 359–. ISBN 978-1-58562-254-2. Truy cập ngày 24 tháng 4 năm 2010. 
  7. Holden, Constance (ngày 2 tháng 11 năm 2001). “'Behavioral' Addictions: Do They Exist?”. Science (bằng tiếng Anh) 294 (5544): 980–982. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 11691967. doi:10.1126/science.294.5544.980
  8. Blum K, Werner T, Carnes S, Carnes P, Bowirrat A, Giordano J, Oscar-Berman M, Gold M (2012). “Sex, drugs, and rock 'n' roll: hypothesizing common mesolimbic activation as a function of reward gene polymorphisms”. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 44 (1): 38–55. PMC 4040958. PMID 22641964. doi:10.1080/02791072.2012.662112. It has been found that deltaFosB gene in the NAc is critical for reinforcing effects of sexual reward. Pitchers and colleagues (2010) reported that sexual experience was shown to cause DeltaFosB accumulation in several limbic brain regions including the NAc, medial pre-frontal cortex, VTA, caudate, and putamen, but not the medial preoptic nucleus. Next, the induction of c-Fos, a downstream (repressed) target of DeltaFosB, was measured in sexually experienced and naive animals. The number of mating-induced c-Fos-IR cells was significantly decreased in sexually experienced animals compared to sexually naive controls. Finally, DeltaFosB levels and its activity in the NAc were manipulated using viral-mediated gene transfer to study its potential role in mediating sexual experience and experience-induced facilitation of sexual performance. Animals with DeltaFosB overexpression displayed enhanced facilitation of sexual performance with sexual experience relative to controls. In contrast, the expression of DeltaJunD, a dominant-negative binding partner of DeltaFosB, attenuated sexual experience-induced facilitation of sexual performance, and stunted long-term maintenance of facilitation compared to DeltaFosB overexpressing group. Together, these findings support a critical role for DeltaFosB expression in the NAc in the reinforcing effects of sexual behavior and sexual experience-induced facilitation of sexual performance. ... both drug addiction and sexual addiction represent pathological forms of neuroplasticity along with the emergence of aberrant behaviors involving a cascade of neurochemical changes mainly in the brain's rewarding circuitry. 
  9. Kuss, Daria (2013). “Internet gaming addiction: current perspectives”. Psychology Research and Behavior Management 6 (6): 125–137. PMC 3832462. PMID 24255603. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S39476
  10. Shenfield, Tali. “Is your child a gaming addict?”. Advanced Psychology. 
  11. Grant, Jon: Impulse Control Disorders: A Clinician's Guide to Understanding and Treating Behavioral Addictions
  12. Johnson, Paul M; Kenny, Paul J (2010). “Dopamine D2 receptors in addiction-like reward dysfunction and compulsive eating in obese rats”. Nature Neuroscience 13 (5): 635–41. PMC 2947358. PMID 20348917. doi:10.1038/nn.2519. Tóm lược dễ hiểu – ScienceDaily (ngày 29 tháng 3 năm 2010). 
  13. “ASAM Definition of Addiction”. Truy cập 1 tháng 2 năm 2020. 

Tài liệu tham khảo

WikiPedia: Nghiện_hành_vi http://www.psy-ed.com/wpblog/child-gaming-addictio... http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/psm/2007-4/p... //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2736529 //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2947358 //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3139704 //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3272277 //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3832462 //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4040958 //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11691967 //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16930171